| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Mr Gone
Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 8
|
 Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 6:51 pm Post subject: What Mistresses do. |
 |
|
First let me say how great your program is. Also how well spoken the Mistress is. I particularly like her concern for the limits of her subs and for cleanliness and safety.
However, she does make it sound that a mistress is there only to cause pain and that that had better be what gives you pleasure. I think there are a variety of mistresses. I am NOT talking about having sex with the mistress, but for me--no release, no pleasure.
An orgasm can be obtained by the mistress "ordering" me to masturbate or hump a pillow while she whips me. This can also involve the old "stop" as I get close to cuming (2 m's there?). It can be having a vibrator strapped to my cock or being placed in a position where it presses against me or for me to try to get the pressure I need--but the sessions ends with sperm coming from the end of my cock!
Frankly, I'm paying for a service, and as long as nothing illegal takes place, it's all about me. Now I know that with slaves its suppose to be all about the mistress, but I consider myself to be a client, not a slave. It might be interesting to have a discussion on the show about these types differences.
Too bad though--Mistress Dominion is so hot.
David |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Prof. Tom
Site Admin
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
Posts: 159
Location: From our great studio in Roger's Park, Chicago
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 7:29 pm Post subject: Re: What Mistresses do. |
|
|
Thanks for posting this. There is a lot of fantasy about male subs, but I don't get a lot of real world reports. Great read.
| Mr Gone wrote: |
| It might be interesting to have a discussion on the show about these types differences. |
Another good idea. We have to be careful what "types". If we cover ANYTHING that could count as prostitution, we could be arrested. We broadcast from the US, which is currently a right wing country.
But, we do plan on a mistress roundtable in the future.
Thanks for the kind words and for listening to our show.
_________________
Prof. Tom
Kinky Sex Radio
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mr Gone
Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 8
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 11:17 am Post subject: Re: What Mistresses do. |
|
|
| kinkysex wrote: |
Another good idea. We have to be careful what "types". If we cover ANYTHING that could count as prostitution, we could be arrested. We broadcast from the US, which is currently a right wing country.
|
It is not illegal to discuss prostitiution (it used to come up on Phil Donahue's program all the time!)--only to request or do it. However there is no doubt that Bush and his cronies would like to make even the thought of it illegal.
This brings up another interesting topic--hypocrisy. It would be interesting to know how many of these bible-thumpers are seeing pros or engaging in forced-bi, etc. I have nothing against anything between consenting adults--of course prostitution should be legal. I'm just a knight against hypocrisy.
David
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Prof. Tom
Site Admin
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
Posts: 159
Location: From our great studio in Roger's Park, Chicago
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 6:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Discussing prostitution with someone engaged in acts similiar to prostitution IS ILLEGAL IN SEVERAL STATES.
Since we 'broadcast' internationally, we do have to be careful.
Things have changed since the days of Donahue. Hell, things have changed since last month...
http://www.techweb.com/wire/ebiz/177101984
This will get worse before it gets better, I fear.
_________________
Prof. Tom
Kinky Sex Radio |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
J.W.
Joined: 04 Jan 2006
Posts: 58
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 11:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
I just want to know why they want to know how much porn is being looked up on the internet when we're still fighting a losing war.
_________________
Don't worry, it's only kinky once. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SirCJ
Joined: 13 Jan 2006
Posts: 7
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 11:21 pm Post subject: Re: What Mistresses do. |
|
|
| kinkysex wrote: |
| We broadcast from the US, which is currently a right wing country. |
Nothing wrong with us conservatives.  I sure hope you guys keep politics out of the podcast. It seems everywhere I turn I have to hear some sort of garbage stating how horrible "right wingers" are. Might I say how politically the feeling is mutual regarding "left wing spin". 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SirCJ
Joined: 13 Jan 2006
Posts: 7
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 11:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| J.W. wrote: |
| I just want to know why they want to know how much porn is being looked up on the internet when we're still fighting a losing war. |
They're looking for child porn sites. I shouldn't have to explain more. What "war" are you losing?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Prof. Tom
Site Admin
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
Posts: 159
Location: From our great studio in Roger's Park, Chicago
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 3:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| SirCJ wrote: |
| They're looking for child porn sites. I shouldn't have to explain more. |
I'm not trying to fight with you, but this Google thing has NOTHING to do with child porn sites.
To be fair, the Bush administration is NOT CLAIMING that this is a fight against child porn. The news agencies have misquoted the administration. A lot. And this is from a guy who doesn't like the current president. 
The Google issue is about, "protecting children from seeing porn." That's a HUGE difference. It's about your 8 year old seeing a naked 22 year old, not the other way around.
This is a minor detail, but I hate it when the press corps just vomits the lies of each other. Now, at least we can have honest debate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Read the act here: http://www.epic.org/free_speech/censorship/copa.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
And then read this: (my emphasis)
“The Justice Department is asking Internet search giant Google to turn over search records in an effort to defend a child pornography law”
– CNN
“The company has refused to turn over the data, which the Bush Administration claims it will use in its fight against child pornography.”
– Forbes
“The US Department of Justice wants the information to help it to establish how much child pornography is available on the internet”
– Times Online
“However, the Supreme Court invited the government to either come up with a less drastic version of the law or go to trial to prove that the statute does not violate the First Amendment and is the only viable way to combat child porn.”
– Mercury News
“The government doesn’t need Google’s data to go after child porn (KP) sites.”
– Make You Go Hmm.com
“The Supreme Court invited the government to either come up with a less drastic version of the law or go to trial to prove that the statute does not violate the First Amendment and is the only viable way to combat child porn.”
– Slashdot (itself citing Mercury News)
“Trolling through two month’s worth of random results at the world’s leading search engine, as the government’s original subpoena requested, presumably would give Justice Department investigators a good read on what percentage of those searches were for child porn.”
– MarketWatch
_________________
Prof. Tom
Kinky Sex Radio
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SirCJ
Joined: 13 Jan 2006
Posts: 7
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 11:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| kinkysex wrote: |
| SirCJ wrote: |
| They're looking for child porn sites. I shouldn't have to explain more. |
I'm not trying to fight with you, but this Google thing has NOTHING to do with child porn sites.
|
You are correct. My brain recorded the information incorrectly. 
As long as the search engine companies are only providing the search terms (again from my memory) and not your IP address, I don't really see the harm. I used to watch WebCrawler(?) and they allowed one to see in real time what people were searching for.
Here's another quote:
"We are trying to gather up information in order to help the enforcement of a federal law to ensure the protection, quite frankly, of our nation's children against pornography," Gonzales said in Washington on Friday. "We are not asking for the identity of Americans."
Yahoo Inc. and Microsoft Corp. confirmed that they had complied, at least partially, with similar subpoenas. America Online, owned by Time Warner Inc., said it provided a list of search requests already publicly available from other sources.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
J.W.
Joined: 04 Jan 2006
Posts: 58
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 2:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| SirCJ wrote: |
| J.W. wrote: |
| I just want to know why they want to know how much porn is being looked up on the internet when we're still fighting a losing war. |
They're looking for child porn sites. I shouldn't have to explain more. What "war" are you losing?
|
I agree that politics shouldn't be brought into the kinky sex radio arena, so I won't rise to the challenge of argueing about the war here.
I will say and ask the following though, I've been searching itunes and the web for political podcasts from both the left and the right.
Out of them all, I have yet to find a decent right wing positive podcast that provides facts and dates like some of the Left wing podcasts.
Blast the Right
Citizen against Lies
Democracy Now
These are a few of the better podcasts I've listened too, but to be fair...
Right Wing Nut Job
I don't know what to make of this program, is it a parady or is it serious?
This is a serious request for Right Wing friendly news podcast that deals in facts and dates and quotes that doesn't have a religious bent to it. If you can provide that for me I would be grateful.
_________________
Don't worry, it's only kinky once.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mdevietro
Joined: 25 Jan 2006
Posts: 8
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2006 1:17 pm Post subject: A note about politics |
|
|
As a political "guru" I have no problems with politics at anypoint anywhere however as a conservative I have come to some key conclusuions that I think should be stated here.
1. As this is a "fetish" site the political balence is going to be not just slighted tipped but extremly slanted. This does not bother me because KSR does not make claims about being centered.
2. The google thing has gotten very twisted most of the collection was to make a simulated internet as evidence to defend the law.
3. Why say the politics is not welcome here instead allow ALL view points to be welcome here ALL DEMOCRACY IS GOOD
Thank you for you time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Prof. Tom
Site Admin
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
Posts: 159
Location: From our great studio in Roger's Park, Chicago
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2006 2:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Remember, you can always use the, "Take it outside" section to REALLY have it out.
I'm always up for a good debate.
_________________
Prof. Tom
Kinky Sex Radio |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Prof. Tom
Site Admin
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
Posts: 159
Location: From our great studio in Roger's Park, Chicago
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
littleMiss
Joined: 28 Feb 2006
Posts: 37
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 03, 2006 2:22 pm Post subject: lifestyle v. pro |
|
|
| ok, so back to the original post in this thread.... What I'd really like to hear discussed is the differences between weekending or sessions, and lifestyle bdsm. All I truly know about is lifestyle, and what I have learned is more than just pain and pleasure, that there is an extensive amount of trust with them, not only as a lover or a partner, but as something more as well. What I have experienced includes learning; both intellectual and about the partner. How different is this experience from what others are experiencing? I know where each's limits are, but I wonder if my experience is in relation of others out there. I am learning, I know I do not know everything there is to know, nor will I ever, but pointers are greatly appreciated. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
