|
KinkySexRadio.com
Welcome to Kinky Sex Radio user forums
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
sistert
Joined: 25 Apr 2006
Posts: 15
|
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 4:13 pm Post subject: All Women Are Submissive |
|
|
OK, this is just a question that I have to ask out of curiousity to know if it's just me or what?
Is it my imagination or do most men see women in the scene as bottoms/submissives/slaves? Especially in the club arena.
I'm a top/domme (depends on who I'm playing with) but must give off submissive vibes or something. Unless I've been seen playing or wearing something announcing I'm a sadist, male tops come up to me and ask if I'd like to play with them. The minute they understand that I'm not a bottom or that I don't even switch, they either ask me if I'm sure (yes, want to see my singletail?) or high tail it over to the next lady.
I'm a playful person by nature so I don't stay in the "Lick my boots!" mode all the freakin' time. And maybe that's the rub because that's not my personal style.
So before I rant on any further, thoughts please. Is it just generally an accepted thought that typically women bottom and typically men top? If a woman is not always acting like a Gestapo Bitch, does that make her any less a top? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
EuphoriaZ
Joined: 02 May 2006
Posts: 12
Location: Santa Monica, CA, USA
|
Posted: Tue May 02, 2006 9:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think that, in general, there tend to be more female sumbissives and male dominants. I'm not sure if its a nature or nurture thing, but it has been my experience with the limited knowledge I have. I do have female friends who are very dominant, as well as a male friend who is very submissive.
Perhaps the reason it is assumed is more of a social thing, and more of how the kink has been portrayed to the outside community (these views influence everyone, including those inside the community, at least subconciously).
Also, you see what may be a parallel to this with guys and lesbians. The whole "are you sure? I can change your mind" aspect is there, as you had experienced at your meetup.
_________________
Careful, I bite!
~Rebekkah |
|
Back to top |
|
|
OneBoundPirate
Joined: 19 Apr 2006
Posts: 12
Location: Chico, California
|
Posted: Tue May 02, 2006 11:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I almost would say that alot of this assumption and stereotyping comes from our history. In most cultures, men were in charge and women were suppose to follow their orders, and this still holds true in many places. The whole weaker of the sexes issue. I still meet men who, although not into the scene (that they know of) decide they can order anyone with a vagina around that usually, although I am submissive, results in them getting slapped.
But I really do believe that it is just tied in with our past, when women could be beat, men kept mistresses openly, and everyone seemed to believe it was what should be. And how many women still take care of the household cleaning, cooking, laundry, etc. I sometimes wonder if my partner would starve to death if I never cooked....
_________________
Run Rabbit, Run. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
EuphoriaZ
Joined: 02 May 2006
Posts: 12
Location: Santa Monica, CA, USA
|
Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 1:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
See, i've been trying to have this discussion in my Social Problems class at school. The teacher is such a feminist liberal that its hard to ge any point across withut your opinions being shot down.
ANYways basically the way I look at it:
Yes, there are a lot of historical examples of males being the dominant sex. My question is why, basically. Yo see the same thing in the animal kingdom, for the most part. I am of the mindset that, while it isnt an absolute thing, physically, men have more of the drive and capability to be dominant, while women have more of a submissive tendency. Its nt absolute, but I am very sure there are definate biological reasons. Yay for that research being taboo. =/
_________________
Careful, I bite!
~Rebekkah |
|
Back to top |
|
|
littleMiss
Joined: 28 Feb 2006
Posts: 37
|
Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 8:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
well... some animals, females are the dominant. but... for help with your prof, i'd suggest looking at some carol pateman pieces, she was a feminist but thought about your question. or, you can always look at some of the elizabeth cady stanton speeches, she has a LOT to say about men...
well, good luck! ps- philosophy does deal with this question, all the way back to Plato's republic and more. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
curiousaussiebabe
Joined: 04 Mar 2006
Posts: 6
Location: Sydney, Australia
|
Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 6:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I like to think of myself more like the female trapdoor spider, who eats the male after mating! Seroiusly though, there are so many male chauvinists out there still unfortunately, who think that women should still be seen but not heard. I am heavily involved in football, and the amount of men that have refused to listen to my opinion, or just plain ignore that I exist is just astonishing! My partner is very liberated in that regard ( I am the dominant), it just shocks me that we really haven't come that far. I tell you, there are some men that I would love to show the business end of my flogger.
_________________
I'll try anything once, or twice! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Prof. Tom
Site Admin
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
Posts: 159
Location: From our great studio in Roger's Park, Chicago
|
Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 7:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I keep hearing that truly dominant men are rare. I'm not saying it's true, just that submissive women keep telling me they are rare.
Any sub girls have thoughts on this?
_________________
Prof. Tom
Kinky Sex Radio |
|
Back to top |
|
|
EuphoriaZ
Joined: 02 May 2006
Posts: 12
Location: Santa Monica, CA, USA
|
Posted: Thu May 04, 2006 12:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Truly dominant people in general are very rare, in my opinion. Bothe for men and women really.
_________________
Careful, I bite!
~Rebekkah |
|
Back to top |
|
|
OneBoundPirate
Joined: 19 Apr 2006
Posts: 12
Location: Chico, California
|
Posted: Thu May 04, 2006 1:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
But we have to begin by defining "truly dominate". I mean, are we talking about someone who is dominate in every action every day, because I usually think of them as assholes (pardon my french). But that would be what truly dominate is to me: on a daily basis ordering everyone around and expecting their orders to be followed without fail. But if we're talking someone who is Mr. Joe Regular day to day, but comes home and expects their slave to be naked kneeled at the door waiting for them then yes, I do believe they're out there. But damn I wish I could find one. I guess it would be contradictory to say I have a master in training, eh?
_________________
Run Rabbit, Run. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
EuphoriaZ
Joined: 02 May 2006
Posts: 12
Location: Santa Monica, CA, USA
|
Posted: Thu May 04, 2006 2:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
What I think of, when I think of the true dominant I was talking about, is someone who cannot be submissive, and more often than not favors being dominant over vanilla. In my mind this always has to do with sex, but I understand that there are completely non-sexual ways to be dominant or sumissive. I would say I am 95% a true submissive, as Ipretty much only like being submissive. I've had plenty of vanilla sex, but to be honest, its very boring, even when I love my partner. As for being dominant, sometimes I end up in that position, but I really get no enjoyment out of it whatsoever.
_________________
Careful, I bite!
~Rebekkah |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lasher
Joined: 19 Apr 2006
Posts: 6
Location: Austin, TX
|
Posted: Fri May 05, 2006 4:29 pm Post subject: Re: All Women Are Submissive |
|
|
sistert wrote: |
The minute they understand that I'm not a bottom or that I don't even switch, they either ask me if I'm sure (yes, want to see my singletail?) or high tail it over to the next lady.
|
Look on the bright side:
At least they aren't asking you if you're a sub, finding out you're a dom and then asking if you'll top them!
I kid you not, I have seen just that at more than one public club. In both cases, it was by some very "off-the-street" looking guy who I don't think had ever been there before.
So cheer up, perhaps you're not giving off any "sub vibe" but you're just being hounded by HNG's who're looking for the easiest way to get laid.
_________________
-Someday you'll meet someone...someone special....someone who won't press charges.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lasher
Joined: 19 Apr 2006
Posts: 6
Location: Austin, TX
|
Posted: Fri May 05, 2006 4:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
OneBoundPirate wrote: |
I guess it would be contradictory to say I have a master in training, eh? |
Not at all.
I have a personal loathing for the people who pop up and are suddenly calling themselves "master" this (interestingly, the gender differential makes this much more offensive somehow than the "mistress" appellation, probably because of the intrinsic other historical connotations of the word, but I digress) or "dom" that; on what are they basing this claim to expertise other than as a wannable aspiring to that level of achievement.
You are not a master by title but by deeds and action. In the old style, it was only the acclaim of your peers that would elevate you to the status of being a Master, so if someone claims to be one then there'd better be a long list of people there to affirm that fact-otherwise they're just a poser.
I've been doing this for many years, I've taught and mentored many people on many skill techniques; but I wouldn't dream of ever calling myself a "master" of anything. Expert, yes, but I just can't quite make the jump to the m word. I think it's the part of my early marital arts learning and my eastern philophical studying that got stuck - life is a journey of exploration and learning and we are all but students. The day you think you've learned it all is when someone will demonstrate just how foolish you really are.
RC
_________________
-Someday you'll meet someone...someone special....someone who won't press charges.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ScorpioSub
Joined: 09 Apr 2006
Posts: 47
|
Posted: Fri May 05, 2006 10:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
OneBoundPirate wrote: |
But we have to begin by defining "truly dominate". I mean, are we talking about someone who is dominate in every action every day, because I usually think of them as assholes (pardon my french). But that would be what truly dominate is to me: on a daily basis ordering everyone around and expecting their orders to be followed without fail. But if we're talking someone who is Mr. Joe Regular day to day, but comes home and expects their slave to be naked kneeled at the door waiting for them then yes, I do believe they're out there. But damn I wish I could find one. I guess it would be contradictory to say I have a master in training, eh? |
Not to pick on you, but this just drive me nuts, so I'm going to say something...
Dominate is a verb.
Dominant is an adjective. It has been used as a noun as of late (i.e. "a dominant person" has been shortened to "a dominant")
A person is, therefore, dominant rather than dominate.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|